TOP 50 DIGITAL AGENCIES FOR 2007
Posted by Mort Greenberg on May 10, 2008
Article Source: http://adage.com
TOP 50 DIGITAL AGENCIES | ||||||||
RANKED BY ’07 U.S. DIGITAL REVENUE FOR AGENCIES FROM ANY DISCIPLINE. DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS. | ||||||||
RANK | U.S. DIGITAL REVENUE | |||||||
2007 | 2006 | AGENCY [PARENT] | HEADQUARTERS | 2007 | 2006 | %CHG | ||
1 | 1 | Digitas* [Publicis] | Boston | $345,000 | $257,000 | 34.2 | ||
2 | 2 | Avenue A/Razorfish [Microsoft Corp.] | Seattle | 299,320 | 235,415 | 27.1 | ||
3 | 6 | Rapp Collins Worldwide* [Omnicom] | New York | 204,000 | 107,100 | 90.5 | ||
4 | 3 | OgilvyInteractive* [WPP] | New York | 203,900 | 175,300 | 16.3 | ||
5 | NA | IBM Interactive* [IBM Corp.] | Chicago | 188,000 | NA | NA | ||
6 | 4 | Sapient [Sapient Corp.] | Cambridge, Mass. | 164,000 | 148,000 | 10.8 | ||
7 | 5 | Wunderman* [WPP] | New York | 162,250 | 145,200 | 11.7 | ||
8 | 7 | AKQA | San Francisco | 128,000 | 98,000 | 30.6 | ||
9 | 9 | Organic* [Omnicom] | San Francisco | 125,300 | 86,400 | 45.0 | ||
10 | 12 | R/GA* [Interpublic] | New York | 102,200 | 76,600 | 33.4 | ||
11 | 8 | DraftFCB* [Interpublic] | Chicago/New York | 100,000 | 94,100 | 6.3 | ||
12 | NA | iCrossing | Scottsdale, Ariz. | 98,000 | NA | NA | ||
13 | 15 | IMC2* | Dallas | 91,749 | 61,707 | 48.7 | ||
14 | NA | Isobar* [Aegis Group] | London | 91,500 | NA | NA | ||
15 | 11 | G2* [WPP] | New York | 90,258 | 80,100 | 12.7 | ||
16 | 17 | Tribal DDB* [Omnicom] | New York | 88,000 | 60,000 | 46.7 | ||
17 | NA | MRM Worldwide* [Interpublic] | New York | 84,000 | NA | NA | ||
18 | 21 | Web.com (Submitawebsite, Leads.com) | Jacksonville, Fla. | 83,000 | 52,000 | 59.6 | ||
19 | 13 | Purple@Epsilon* [Alliance Data Systems] | Irving, Texas | 80,000 | 68,000 | 17.6 | ||
20 | 20 | VML* [WPP] | Kansas City, Mo. | 74,000 | 56,000 | 32.1 | ||
21 | 19 | Acxiom Digital [Acxiom Corp.] | Foster City, Calif. | 70,000 | 57,000 | 22.8 | ||
22 | 16 | WhittmanHart Interactive | Chicago | 69,000 | 60,650 | 13.8 | ||
23 | 14 | Agency.com* [Omnicom] | New York | 68,300 | 65,000 | 5.1 | ||
24 | 18 | Critical Mass* [Omnicom] | Chicago | 67,000 | 58,000 | 15.5 | ||
25 | 24 | Brulant | Beachwood, Ohio | 53,227 | 36,326 | 46.5 | ||
26 | 30 | Digitas Health* [Publicis] | Philadelphia | 51,000 | 30,000 | 70.0 | ||
27 | 23 | Ascentium (1) | Bellevue, Wash. | 50,800 | 37,000 | 37.3 | ||
28 | 22 | TMP Worldwide Advertising and Comms. | New York | 48,431 | 40,187 | 20.5 | ||
29 | 28 | DoubleClick Performics* [Google] | Chicago | 47,900 | 33,970 | 41.0 | ||
30 | 36 | Blast Radius* [WPP] | Vancouver/New York | 45,000 | 27,229 | 65.3 | ||
30 | 25 | Fry | Ann Arbor, Mich. | 45,000 | 36,000 | 25.0 | ||
32 | NA | Goodby, Silverstein & Partners* [Omnicom] | San Francisco | 43,680 | NA | NA | ||
33 | 26 | Arc Worldwide* [Publicis] | Chicago | 43,200 | 34,400 | 25.6 | ||
34 | 27 | 360i* | New York | 42,000 | 34,000 | 23.5 | ||
35 | 31 | Schematic* [WPP] | Los Angeles | 40,200 | 29,600 | 35.8 | ||
36 | 35 | Resource Interactive | Columbus, Ohio | 38,500 | 27,300 | 41.0 | ||
37 | 37 | AtmosphereBBDO* [Omnicom] | New York | 37,800 | 27,000 | 40.0 | ||
38 | NA | Publicis Modem & Dialog* [Publicis] | New York | 36,719 | NA | NA | ||
39 | 29 | RMG Connect* [WPP] | New York | 33,840 | 33,840 | 0.0 | ||
40 | 59 | Hawkeye [Hawkeye Group] | Dallas | 33,500 | 13,000 | 157.7 | ||
41 | 39 | Bridge Worldwide* [WPP] | Cincinnati | 31,500 | 24,000 | 31.3 | ||
42 | 41 | T3 | Austin, Texas | 30,809 | 21,091 | 46.1 | ||
43 | 42 | Moxie Interactive* [Publicis] | Atlanta | 30,100 | 19,700 | 52.8 | ||
44 | 32 | Euro RSCG Worldwide* [Havas] | New York | 29,566 | 27,795 | 6.4 | ||
45 | 33 | Campbell-Ewald* [Interpublic] | Warren, Mich. | 28,704 | 27,600 | 4.0 | ||
46 | 38 | Idea Integration Interactive | Jacksonville, Fla. | 28,500 | 24,000 | 18.8 | ||
47 | NA | Zeta Interactive | New York | 27,300 | NA | NA | ||
48 | 40 | Wirestone | Emeryville, Calif. | 26,873 | 23,161 | 16.0 | ||
49 | 60 | Neo@Ogilvy* [WPP] | New York | 25,800 | 12,600 | 104.8 | ||
50 | 43 | Efficient Frontier* | Mountain View, Calif. | 25,793 | 19,652 | 31.3 | ||
Source: Ad Age DataCenter. Chart based on agencies’ disclosures of digital revenue and on DataCenter estimates. Asterisk (*) indicates estimate. Read report methodology. Ranking excludes Leapfrog Online, which uses a distinct business model where its stated revenue includes what other agencies pass through as expenses. It reported ’07 revenue of $85 million vs. $81 million in ’06. Leapfrog, a digital direct-marketing agency focused on generating new customers for clients, is compensated based on performance. It offers the same services as other agencies but absorbs all expenses; Leapfrog makes money by charging clients more for a customer than it costs the agency to generate the customer. Leapfrog’s reported revenue effectively includes media spending; Leapfrog uses a major share of revenue to pay for media, its biggest expense and something that traditional agencies deduct from their Ad Age-reported revenue. (1) Excludes non-marketing operations; MWR, a Spokane, Wash. agency bought in ’07, included in ’07 and ’06 revenue on pro forma basis. Published May 5, 2008, as part of the 64th annual Agency Report. |
Advertisement
This entry was posted on May 10, 2008 at 12:12 pm and is filed under Ad Agencies. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
Leave a Reply